As part of our PhD readiness crash-course, this Saturday evening we engaged on the theme of 'Findings and Discussion within research. Structuring and Navigating Empirical Engagement'. The session was led by Dr Mihika Chatterjee, Assistant Professor at the Department for Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath. The links have been emailed to the cohort.

PhD Readiness Crash-Course Session Report

Theme: Findings and Discussion – Structuring and Navigating Empirical Engagement
Leader: Dr. Mihika Chatterjee, Assistant Professor, University of Bath
Date: [Saturday Evening – as per session schedule]

Introduction

The annual PhD admissions lecture series continues its tradition of equipping aspiring researchers with practical insights into high-quality academic research. This year’s session, focusing on the “Findings and Discussion” section of research papers, was an essential component for prospective PhD candidates keen on pursuing doctoral studies at top global north universities such as those in the UK and USA. Dr. Mihika Chatterjee led the discussion, emphasizing the importance of effectively structuring empirical results and crafting a compelling discussion that situates these findings within broader academic debates.

Session Objectives

Dr. Chatterjee set out to achieve several key objectives during the session:

• Clarify the Role of Findings and Discussion: Explain how the two sections work in tandem to present and contextualize empirical data.

• Provide Structural Guidelines: Offer clear frameworks and models for organizing findings and discussion sections.

• Enhance Critical Engagement: Guide candidates on how to critically analyze and interpret their data to generate meaningful insights.

• Encourage Empirical Rigor: Stress the importance of a systematic approach to data presentation and analysis, ensuring transparency and reproducibility.

Key Components of Empirical Engagement

1. Structuring the Findings Section

Dr. Chatterjee began by breaking down the essential elements of the findings section:

• Clear Presentation of Data: Emphasize the need to present data in a logical order using tables, graphs, and figures to make complex information accessible.

• Objective Reporting: Stress that the findings section should focus on what the data reveals without subjective interpretation.

• Highlighting Key Patterns: Teach methods for identifying and underscoring significant trends, anomalies, and relationships within the data.

• Integration with Methodology: Remind students to tie their findings back to the research methods used, ensuring consistency and validity in the reported results.

2. Crafting a Comprehensive Discussion

Following the presentation of findings, the discussion section is where the researcher interprets the results:

• Contextualizing Findings: Dr. Chatterjee explained how to compare and contrast one’s results with existing literature, thereby highlighting the contribution to the field.

• Theoretical Implications: Detail how to link empirical evidence with theoretical frameworks and models, providing depth to the discussion.

• Addressing Limitations: Encourage openness about the study’s limitations, discussing potential sources of bias or error while suggesting avenues for further research.

• Practical and Policy Recommendations: Highlight the importance of deriving actionable insights from research findings, especially for policy-related studies.

3. Navigating Empirical Data

An important portion of the session focused on strategies for managing and analyzing empirical data:

• Data Management Tools: Overview of software and analytical tools that can help in organizing large datasets.

• Mixed-Methods Approaches: Discussion on combining qualitative and quantitative techniques to enrich analysis and validate findings through triangulation.

• Iterative Analysis: Dr. Chatterjee emphasized that data analysis is often a cyclic process where initial findings may lead to re-examining data or refining research questions.

Practical Strategies and Tips

Throughout the session, Dr. Chatterjee shared a number of practical tips:

• Storytelling with Data: Use narrative techniques to guide the reader through the logical progression from data presentation to interpretation.

• Clarity and Conciseness: Maintain clarity in writing by avoiding jargon and ensuring that each table, figure, or statement adds value.

• Peer Review and Feedback: Actively seek feedback from mentors and peers to refine the presentation of findings and ensure the discussion is well-rounded.

• Time Management: Allocate sufficient time to each phase of writing—from initial analysis to drafting and revising—to ensure high-quality outputs.

Q&A Highlights

The session concluded with an interactive Q&A, where participants raised questions on issues such as:

• How to balance objective reporting in the findings section with the need for insightful interpretation in the discussion.

• Best practices for handling contradictory results or unexpected data trends.

• Strategies for managing large datasets without compromising the narrative flow of the report.

Dr. Chatterjee’s responses reinforced the key messages of the session, emphasizing the need for methodological rigor, transparency, and continuous learning through feedback.

Conclusion and Takeaways

The "Findings and Discussion" session led by Dr. Mihika Chatterjee provided invaluable insights for prospective PhD candidates. The key takeaways include:

• The Necessity of a Well-Structured Report: Both the findings and discussion sections are crucial in communicating research effectively.

• Interconnectedness of Data and Theory: Successful research hinges on the ability to link empirical results to broader theoretical debates.

• Continuous Improvement: Engaging in iterative review processes and seeking feedback are essential practices for refining academic work.

• Practical Strategies for Empirical Engagement: The session underscored the importance of utilizing appropriate tools, managing data efficiently, and presenting it in a coherent, engaging manner.

By following these guidelines and strategies, PhD candidates will be better prepared to navigate the complex landscape of empirical research and to contribute high-quality, impactful studies to their fields.

Related Stories